discussion

Let’s Talk Bookish – All about E-Books

Aria @ Book Nook Bitsย will be the new host for Letโ€™s Talk Bookish! If you arenโ€™t following her yet, good check out her blog and give her a follow!

August 5: All about Ebooksย (suggested by me!)

Prompts: Are ebooks the future of books? What are the advantages and disadvantages of ebooks? Are ebooks strictly better than physical books? Do all avid readers prefer real, paper books? Do you use an e-reader, or read on a phone/tablet? Do you ever find yourself missing one or the other?


Welcome to another week of LTB here at DTRH! This week, it’s a topic suggested by yours truly. I actually don’t really remember what I wanted to say about this topic, but I certainly want to hear all your thoughts on this. So without further ado, let’s dive right in.

I don’t think e-books are strictly the future of books. But I do believe that e-books (and audiobooks) will by and large become a very large market for books, or at least big niches. That being said I don’t think they will either will ever “replace” the other. They really just aren’t the same thing, and there will always be a place in this world for both medias I think!

The main advantages is and will likely always be price and convenience for an e-book. Just nothing beats having unlimited books at your fingertips, limited only really by the memory of your device (although that is also expanding). One disadvantage that I find is that I’m also quite scared to damage my e-reader just as much as a book. So stuffing it randomly in a bag (especially with keys around, etc.) would make me similarly nervous as stuffing a physical book in a bag randomly. It just seems a little bit fragile! Another slight inconvenience is that I like the slightly larger handheld size of the e-reader (book-size), but that means it doesn’t really fit well in my pocket either. Small details, but still.

E-books are definitely not strictly better than regular books, but it definitely depends who you ask and when you’re asking. For example they may be slightly more impervious to water but I still don’t think I’d be swimming with an e-book.

I think generally avid readers do prefer physical books…in the sense that in a perfectly world with unlimited resources and space (and perhaps no environmental impact), people do like physical books a lot. That being said, literally none of those things are true in the real world so there are so many reasons why e-books take the advantage. This doesn’t make e-books any “worse” than regular books though, and in the spirit of this prompt I’d say actually avid readers probably prefer whatever “book” they can get their hands on. The reading experience is important yes, but not at the cost of being able to read the story at all, if you’re an avid reader I think!

I usually do use an e-reader but I also read off the library app on my phone. The phone is definitely slightly more tiring, but it helps a lot when the background is black with the white text (equivalent of dark mode). Of course this slowly drains my phone battery and is still slightly worse for my eyes, but it works in a pinch when there’s something I want to borrow and read. The convenience of these two media are just unmatched!

I am one of those people who will always miss the other when I’m using one. The inconveniences of a real book remind me of an e-book (even something as simple as returning the book to the library, or finding a bookmark), whereas the mechanical feel of an e-reader sometimes makes me feel like missing the feel of turning actual pages in a book. Another inconvenience of an e-reader is being unable to easily flip back and forth between chapters as easy as I could with a physical book. Does anyone else relate to that?


discussion, Uncategorized

Let’s Talk Bookish – Choose Your Own Adventure

Aria @ Book Nook Bits will be the new host for Letโ€™s Talk Bookish! If you arenโ€™t following her yet, good check out her blog and give her a follow!

July 29: Choose your own adventure!

You choose what to write about this week! It can be anything youโ€™d like. (You can also look at old topics from my archive & from Rukkyโ€™s.)


Welcome to another week of LTB here at DTRH, everyone! This week it’sโ€”oh look, it’s choose your own adventure! I have done most of the weeks LTBs, so I’d rather not reuse a topic. Instead I guess I will take the chance to reflect on my experience reading lately; hope you all don’t mind!

Recently I have been super busy with many things happening in my life. So much so that reading has become a borderline chore, and I have to try and keep up with my reading goals. That being said though, I still have really enjoyed the books I have read recently, which is a boon. I do however look for shorter and shorter reads in order to keep up. And it’s only the summer! When September rolls around I am sure it’ll be even worse in terms of keeping up!

I definitely feel the lull again of the low-reading tides, but I think I should embrace [my own adventure]. Keeping up with reading goals is just something nice to maintain, but a reminder to everyone that there are ebbs and flows in all goals! And that’s okay. I think I am still learning to be okay with it and to not feel too “behind” on my goals. There will be periods where I will read quickly and get lots of reading down and there’ll be other weeks where I am way too busy for that. It is good to keep a broad perspective and not to scrutinize the week-to-week (or even month-to-month) too closely, I think. At least for the sake of my own mental health.

I’m glad that I still enjoy reading (even when it’s so rushed!) and I will definitely take a break if I feel it getting worse. Just a friendly reminder here to all those who are feeling a bit burnt out by their goals or their work, and to not worry too much about taking a break! If it ever becomes not fun, you can always back away for a bit, and/or re-prioritize your goals. I’m cheering for all of you!

How are you all feeling lately about reading? Are you in reading slumps or reading frenzies? Or somewhere in between? Let me know in the comments below!


discussion

Let’s Talk Bookish – Long Books vs Short Books

Aria @ Book Nook Bitsย will be the new host for Letโ€™s Talk Bookish! If you arenโ€™t following her yet, good check out her blog and give her a follow!

July 22: Big Books vs. Short Books: Which Do You Prefer? (Jillian @ Jillian the Bookish Butterfly)

Prompts: Do you prefer to read longer books or shorter books? Does it depend on the genre? Why is that? What are the pros and cons of long books? What about shorter books? What long books do you love? What are some of your favorite short books?

Welcome back to another week of LTB here at DTRH, everyone! Today’s topic is certainly a classic, and I honestly wonder if people do have preferences in general. I think at the extremes of very long or very short most people may have an opinion, but I assume the length of a book may not always be even in consideration for a lot of readers. That’s just conjecture though, I’d love to hear what you all think!

For me, the older I get, the more I want short books. I just don’t really have the time to sit down for a 1500 page fantasy book like I used to, even if I still enjoy them from time to time. Of course I don’t need a book to be only 200 pages long, but anything beyond 500 will generally make me pause before taking it up. The good thing is that I tend to enjoy thrillers which are usually on the shorter end anyway, so I don’t run into this problem too much.

I think the length of book really is often determined by the genre. Fantasies and adventures will tend to run longer, while mysteries and thrillers fall on the shorter end. I think for fantasies, authors need time to build up the world to really create something believable. On the other hand, it is difficult to hold a reader’s suspense for too too long, and I think therefore mysteries and thrillers are able to be quite short. After all, the imagination can do a lot of work in those cases!

Longer books tend to have more description, and more time to dive into and develop characters. On the other hand if it’s over done, it can be boring and drag on. Short books can be great, leaving things to the imagination. But again, it could just be underdeveloped. I don’t think a book being long or short on its own is really a pro or con. It’s really how you make use of the space that counts!

If it is long books, I’d actually much prefer series! Harry Potter is probably already one of the longer books (and series) that I’ve read already. As for short books, I really have liked the ones that revolve around folk tales or short stories. Those are always short and sweet, and usually make me think from a new perspective as well.

What do you all prefer – long or short books? Or is length of a book something you don’t consider at all? Let me know in the comments below!