3 star, adult

Review: The Maidens by Alex Michaelides

Edward Fosca is a murderer. Of this Mariana is certain. But Fosca is untouchable. A handsome and charismatic Greek Tragedy professor at Cambridge University, Fosca is adored by staff and students alikeโ€”particularly by the members of a secret society of female students known as The Maidens.

Mariana Andros is a brilliant but troubled group therapist who becomes fixated on The Maidens when one member, a friend of Marianaโ€™s niece Zoe, is found murdered in Cambridge.

Mariana, who was once herself a student at the university, quickly suspects that behind the idyllic beauty of the spires and turrets, and beneath the ancient traditions, lies something sinister. And she becomes convinced that, despite his alibi, Edward Fosca is guilty of the murder. But why would the professor target one of his students? And why does he keep returning to the rites of Persephone, the maiden, and her journey to the underworld?

When another body is found, Marianaโ€™s obsession with proving Foscaโ€™s guilt spirals out of control, threatening to destroy her credibility as well as her closest relationships. But Mariana is determined to stop this killer, even if it costs her everythingโ€”including her own life.



Although I have heard my share of woes over this one, I did have one friend who asked me to read it, so I did it. Unsurprisingly I didn’t enjoy it that much. It wasn’t horrible by any means but if compared to his other book, this one definitely pales in comparison!

The Maidens has an interesting premise whereby there is our main character is who already gung-ho set on a professor being a murderer. It’s fair, since he has a group of young female students whom he calls “The Maidens.” Of course they are all young, rich, and beautiful, and Edward Fosca seems to have them all within his grasp. Our protagonist, Marianna, also faces her own demons from her past as she navigates a new series of murders at her old haunts. Too many coincidences add up…maybe she should get out before it’s too late.

The characters, on their own, were fairly well-crafted and I enjoyed this aspect of the book. Full of clearly flawed characters all trying to get by, while keeping too many secrets, I thought the tensions in the book were excellent. There was even mention of the main character of his other book, and the conversation was so much more chilling having read that book already. But I liked the link between the two books! However, the relationships between the characters might have been a little bit too unbelievable. Without spoiling too much, it just felt like the relationships were more convenient for the plot than out of what was believable. I forgot to mention I just couldn’t really get behind the main character either, she’s just a little bit too paranoid and stubborn for me. You’ll see what I mean about that.

The plot was also okay. I am not a fan of these kinds of stories where you start off having a huge focus on this professor being the murderer and basically never deviating from this story. It felt so forced (because it was), and whether it turns out finally to be the professor or not, either way it wouldn’t be satisfactory. If it was the professor, then we knew it all along; if it wasn’t, it was obvious from the beginning that it wouldn’t be. See how that is kind of lose-lose (at least for me) here? The suspense was fine, but I think as the plot went on it kind of felt like it wasn’t going to go anywhere exciting. I wanted some fireworks kind of ending, and it just kind of fell short of my expectations, unfortunately.

The ending definitely was too unbelievable for me. If anyone has read it, you probably know what I mean. I just didn’t buy it. It wasn’t deus ex machina, but honestly, I felt that it was pretty close. And the punchline that was supposed to be chilling and be that kind of final hit on your psyche didn’t land at all on me. Instead it made me just feel kind of confused. I could see how it could work to be scary and thrilling, but it just totally missed the mark for me. I don’t particularly recommend this one beyond just the face value of it being a thriller suspense novel; in that sense it was good!

Overall Recommendations

The Maidens is a story of a serial killer running loose at Cambridge University. Our protagonist is sure she knows who it is and chases them down. Full of suspense and dark intrigue, the story is certainly full of suspenseful moments as the paranoia within Marianna’s mind builds up more and more up to its finale. For me, there were a few too many moments that were not believable for me to fully enjoy it. Maybe I’m just a little bit too picky, and you may have more luck with it than me!

top ten tuesday

Top Ten Tuesday: Books I Hope Santa Brings in 2022

Top Ten Tuesday was created by The Broke and the Bookish in June of 2010 and was moved to That Artsy Reader Girl in January of 2018. It was born of a love of lists, a love of books, and a desire to bring bookish friends together.


Itโ€™s almost Christmas and Iโ€™m more stressed than I thought Iโ€™d be, friends ๐Ÿฅฒ Work has been insane at times and the wedding planning (and managing of people!!) has been less than stellar. All this to say itโ€™s manifested into physiological anxiety symptoms this last few weeks with my heart that I fervently hope will go away (and stay away) soon.

This weekโ€™s TTT is about gift giving. I always found the kindness of absolute strangers but bonded through the love of reading is the most wonderful thing. I was fortunate enough to have experienced it once and it made my week.

Iโ€™m not feeling the best at the moment so Iโ€™ll post my Amazon wishlist here in case you wanted to take a look. Otherwise, here are the highlights of my list.

Continue reading “Top Ten Tuesday: Books I Hope Santa Brings in 2022”
discussion

Let’s Talk Bookish – Banning Books

Aria @ Book Nook Bitsย will be the new host for Letโ€™s Talk Bookish! If you arenโ€™t following her yet, good check out her blog and give her a follow!

December 16: Banning Books (Jillian @ Jillian the Bookish Butterfly)

Prompts: Do you think banning books is fair? Should students be allowed to read what they want and be able to get it from their school library? In a more broad sense, how do you feel about books that have been โ€œbanned?โ€ Do you think that itโ€™s a crime to ban a book, no matter what it contains, or are there cases where itโ€™s alright? 

Welcome to another week of LTB here at DTRH! Today’s topic is about banning books, suggested by Jillian. I assume this is about banning books from the school library, so I’ll talk about it as such. It’s definitely an interesting topic, I wonder what other people have to say on this!

Banning books is an interesting concept. I personally am just fundamentally against the idea of banning books. Though that being said, I can understand why it is done sometimes, even if I don’t agree with it. Banning books as a concept is just strange to me, because it presupposes that books are bad or restricted for some reason. I think that readers should be the one to make the decision…after reading it. Just labeling a book as banned automatically makes it seem like someone else’s judgment is being substituted for your own, which is just a bit strange for me. I think age limits can sometimes be appropriate, but I can’t really think of a reason for a straight ban on something just permanently.

I feel like in general students should be able to read what they want and get it from the school library, though I am not too familiar with what’s been banned at schools nowadays. I assume graphic explicit content might be selectively removed, but other than that, I don’t see why books wouldn’t be available for a reader. It is only by reading does a reader gain a perspective, and through that make a judgment on whether a book is worthy or not. I would never expect someone to like a book purely because I liked it, nor expect someone to not like a book because I didn’t like it. In the same vein, it seems a bit at odds with the concept of a book to be able to judge it and just deem it inappropriate for others.

Understandably, we as a society do have some discretion on controlling what requires parental supervision/consent, or is just purely 18+. The main problem I think is when bans are booked for their views on something. I think most content has its merit, and even if it doesn’t and is fundamentally flawed for some reason (e.g., advocates for world war), I still think there is likely a reason why it was published, like an interesting perspective, or a moral behind the story. It doesn’t seem right to just pass judgment and have it banned when others have not had the chance to read it.

I’m not going to call it a crime because that seems a little bit strong, but I do believe most books have their merit, and after all, they were published by somebody. At worst, it’s the change to learn about some minority views, or maybe how an institution has failed us. I think sometimes books are banned for stirring up voices and “disturbing the peace” (particularly in some countries). Again, while I understand the general notion of wanting peace, it shouldn’t necessarily be at the expense of knowledge and stifling knowledge. Sometimes banning something can make it more tantalizing too, or drive its knowledge underground; I don’t think this necessarily helps the situation either. The problem is likely much more complicated than banning or not banning a book. I feel like banning a book is likely a bandaid solution to something bigger.

What do you all think about banning books? Let me know in the comments below!